ULU|


Login, : : [ Register ]Skip to Content

Latest News

Search ulu.co.uk

:

Popular Searches
- energybase
- shop
- contact us

► TAKE A LOOK INSIDE

► ULU poll

Would you travel on the underground/public transport more frequently if the discount was extended to single and one day tickets?



Poll Results...

ADVERTISE THROUGH US

Want to promote through the ULU Network?
ULU has various student marketing and student advertising tools that can promote your services direct to UK students.
Click here for our student marketing & advertising opportunities
 


► Degree Awarding Powers

02/03 Policy

Valid AULUC 2008

DEGREE AWARDING POWERS

Proposed by: James MacColl [ULU V-P Welfare & Student Affairs]

Seconded by: Rob Davenport [ULU V-P Sports], Claire Wren [ULU V-P Finance & Societies]; Charlotte Dawkins [ULU President]

THIS UNION NOTES

1.       The London Business School has its own degree-awarding powers. Imperial College has applied to the Privy Council for degree-awarding powers, and King’s College London, University College London and the London School of Economics have all indicated their intention to apply for degree-awarding powers.

2.          University Ordinance 21:

 

Undertakings

6.                    Each College shall abide by the Statutes, Ordinances (including this Ordinance) and Regulations of the University of London and in particular shall:

(1) award degrees only by the exercise of the powers conferred on it by resolution of the Council and in accordance with the Ordinances;

I.e. A College cannot use its own degree-awarding powers whilst remaining within the University of London.

3.          Document C511, The University Council, 19th March 2003:

The Council is asked to agree, in principle, the relaxation of the provision in Ordinance 21 to permit Colleges to award their own degrees…

i.e. The University Council has agreed to approve a process of consultation, with the aim of changing the regulations to allow Colleges to award their own degrees whilst remaining within the University.

See Appendix A

4.          Paper U, ULU Council, 9th December 2002:

THIS UNION RESOLVES

1.          To establish a University of London Review Group…”

(This will be referred to hereafter as “the Review Group”).

2.          Current ULU policy to support and campaign for the University to maintain its current structure.

E.g. most recently, Paper U, ULU Council, 9th December 2002:

THIS UNION FURTHER RESOLVES

1.       That the Sabbatical Officers should continue to campaign for the retention of the University, in its present form, until such a time that the Review Group have reported their findings and Council has set policy.”

THIS UNION BELIEVES

1.          That if Colleges must leave the University in order to use their degree-awarding powers, there is a distinct possibility of them doing so.

2.          That allowing Colleges to exercise their degree-awarding powers will encourage them to remain within the University.

3.          That there are a number of benefits to Colleges being part of the University, e.g. closer ties to like-minded institutions and federal courses, as well as the University of London degree.

4.          That the University must take into account the opinions of students, not just Heads of Colleges, when making decisions that affect them.

THIS UNION FURTHER BELIEVES

1.       That the student members of The University Council should be able to make informed decisions in order to represent University of London students fairly.

THIS UNION RESOLVES

1.       To mandate the Review Group to carry out a survey of student opinion, which will consider:

a)          Student opinion of the value of the University of London degree.

b)          What the most valuable aspects of the University are.

2.       That this survey, and the findings of the Review Group, will form the basis of policy either supporting or opposing the proposals outlined in Appendix A.

3.       To mandate the President, Vice-Presidents and Committees Officer to lobby the Vice-Chancellor and The University Council to consult ULU and students on the issue of degree-awarding powers.

PASSED: 28TH April 2003

APPENDIX A

THE COUNCIL

Item: 6

DOCUMENT: C511

19 March 2003

 

 

DEGREE-AWARDING POWERS

 

REPORT BY: The Vice-Chancellor

 

To consider a report by the Vice-Chancellor on the exercise by Colleges of degree-awarding powers and to approve its recommendations.

 

 

1.             The Council, at its meeting on 4 December 2002, noted that Imperial College had applied to the Privy Council for degree-awarding powers, and that the Heads of Colleges, at their next meeting, would consider whether they wished the University to review its present policy on the use of degree-awarding powers (CM 17 refers). Since the meeting of Council in December, King’s College London, University College London and the London School of Economics have all indicated their intention to apply for degree-awarding powers.

 

2.             The current Ordinances require that the only degrees which a College may award while remaining a College of the University are those of the University of London.  Thus, if a College has the power to award its own degrees, it cannot exercise those powers while remaining a College of the University.  Heads of Colleges have discussed the question of degree-awarding powers for Colleges on two occasions since the December meeting of Council.  They are unanimous that there should be a relaxation of the provision in the current Ordinances regarding the use of a College’s degree-awarding powers and are agreed that the following principles should underlie a new University policy on this matter:

(i) There should be no requirement on a College to seek degree-awarding powers of its own.

 

(ii) Colleges that wish to continue to award the University of London degree should be able to do so.

 

(iii) Any College which has its own degree-awarding powers should normally be required to use them in the following circumstances:

For honorary degrees; for validation; for franchising; and for joint degrees with other institutions in the UK or overseas (although it should be open to a College to make a case to the University for using the University of London degree, eg for a joint degree with another institution, where this would be particularly helpful).

 

(iv) There should be a presumption that a College with degree-awarding powers which it wished to use for its students would use them across the board and would not normally offer some of its degrees as College awards and others as University of London awards, but it should be open to a College to make a case to the University for exemption in particular cases – eg where a joint programme is offered with another College of the University which does not have its own degree-awarding powers; or for medical, dental and veterinary qualifications if legal and possibly other considerations require or argue for different treatment.

 

3.             The Governance Committee, at its meeting on 25 February 2003, recommended to the Council that amendments be made to Ordinance 21, in accordance with Statute 27, and subject to the comments of the Senate.

 

4.             In order to give effect to this change in policy it will be necessary to amend Ordinance 21. The following draft amendments are put forward for consideration (for ease of reference amendments have been highlighted with strikethrough and underline as appropriate):

 

Undertakings

6.             Each College shall abide by the Statutes, Ordinances (including this Ordinance) and Regulations of the University of London and in particular shall:

(1)            award degrees only by the exercise of the powers conferred on it by resolution of the Council and in accordance with the Ordinances;

7.        A College which holds, or acquires, the power to award its own degrees shall inform the Council accordingly.

 

8.        A College with the power to award its own degrees shall comply with such protocols as may, from time to time, be agreed by the Council, in deciding the extent, if any, to which the College will exercise the authority given to all Colleges under Ordinance 13 and Ordinance 24 to award degrees of the University of London; and shall inform the Council of its decision.

 

(2)9.      A College shall     confer the title of Professor or Reader only in accordance with the Ordinances.

 

7.10.                The Council may from time to time seek written assurances on such other matters as the Council considers necessary and may prescribe conditions on which a College continues to hold College status.

 

5.             At its meeting on 4 March 2003, the Senate considered and discussed this matter in detail (see also item 15, Document C519).  The proposal was put to a vote and the Senate resolved nem com to advise the Council to amend Ordinance 21 as set out in paragraph 4 above.

 

6.             Having already canvassed the views of the Heads of Colleges, the Governance Committee and the Senate on this matter, it is proposed that the required amendments to Ordinance 21 be dealt with in accordance with paragraph 4(4) of Ordinance 1 attached at Appendix C511A, and be circulated not less than one calendar month before the next meeting of the Council, on 2 July 2003, for its formal approval.

 

 

 


                                                                                           

The Council is asked to agree, in principle, the relaxation of the provision in Ordinance 21 to permit Colleges to award their own degrees in accordance with the principles set out in paragraph 2 above.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COUNCIL

Item: 6

Appendix: C511A

19 March 2003

 

 

DEGREE-AWARDING POWERS

 

Extract From Ordinance 1

 

 

Making, Ratifying, Amending and Revoking Ordinances

4.       The procedure for Ordinances which are subject to Statute 27 shall be as follows:

(1)      The proposal shall be sent to all members of the Council not less than three calendar months before the ordinary meeting of the Council at which it will be considered with an invitation for comments to be received not more than one calendar month later.

 

(2)      In terms of Clause 7 of Statue 21, the Governance Committee shall, on behalf of the Council, seek the view of the Senate, as appropriate, on any such proposal which, in the opinion of the Governance Committee, is relevant to them.

 

(3)      The Governance Committee shall consider comments and may modify the proposal.  The proposal on which comments were invited, a report by the Governance Committee on comment received and any revised proposal shall be sent to all members of the Council not less than one calendar month before the ordinary meeting of the Council and shall be included on the agenda paper for that meeting of the Council.

 

(4)      Notwithstanding the procedure in paragraph 3 and sub-paragraphs (1)-(3) above, the vice-chancellor may put direct to the Council proposals for amendment which in the vice-chancellor’s opinion are minor or non-contentious.  Any such proposals shall be sent to all members of the Council not less than one calendar month before the ordinary meeting of the Council and shall be included on the agenda paper for that meeting of the Council.

 

(5)                   The proposal shall be approved if at the ordinary meeting of the Council at least two-thirds