Return to Graphical Version


Login, : : [ Register ]Skip to Content

► HELP ON ULU

Send us your comments.

- Login Problems? Click Here.

Search ulu.co.uk

:

Popular Searches
- elections
- energybase
- contact us

► ULU poll

What do you think of the new London 2012 Olympic logo?


Poll Results...

ADVERTISE THROUGH US

Want to promote through the ULU Network?
ULU has various student marketing and student advertising tools that can promote your services direct to UK students.
Click here for our student marketing & advertising opportunities

BAM Student Marketing

Cheap Flights with SkyScanner

Mobikade FREE SMS

Specialist Student Insurance from Cover4Students.com

theBrunswick

► Motion to Create a Working Party on the ULU Constitution

02/03 Policy

Valid AULUC 2008

 

 

MOTION TO CREATE A WORKING PARTY ON THE ULU CONSTITUTION

Proposed by: Claire Wren [ULU V-P Finance & Societies]

Seconded by: Susie Reilly [ULU, Students with Disabilities Officer], James MacColl [ULU V-P Welfare & Student Affairs]. Ben McMechan University College London Union [Finance & Adminstration Officer], Nigel Harris, [University College London Union [Education & Welfare Officer] David Utting [King’s College London Union President], Johann Malawana [Queen Mary University of London Vice-President Association], Ralph Redfern [King’s College London Union  Media & Publicity Officer]

 

THIS UNION NOTES               

 

There are a number of inconsistencies in the ULU Constitution and Regulations;

1.          It is ULU policy to review the executive job descriptions;

2.          Election nominations for the term of office 2002-2003 open on the 20th January 2003;

3.          The nomination requirements for ULU elections have been significantly reduced following the election review at the end of the academic year 2001-2002; and

4.          The first ULU Council of the Spring Term is on the 27th January 2003.

 

THIS UNION BELIEVES

 

 A constitutional review ought to be carried out this year;

1.          A constitutional review is best carried out by those interested in the outcome;

2.          Any constitutional review ought to have effect from the earliest possible time (2003-2004);

3.          It is poor practice to amend job descriptions part of the way through a nomination period;

4.          A Constitutional review may be adversely affected by the start of an election period – possibly preventing the necessary thoroughness and lack of bias;

5.          There would be no significantly adverse effect of a slight delay to the opening of nominations.

 

THIS UNION RESOLVES

1.          Delay the opening of nominations until the 3rd February; and

2.          Create a “constitutional review working party�? with Terms of Reference and Membership as defined in Appendix A.

 

Appendix A

 

1.                    Membership of Working Group:

a)        Chair of Council (Convenor and Chair of Working Group)

b)        The Senior Treasurer

c)        Members of Governance Committee

d)        Any other interested person who is a member of ULU.

 

2.                    Terms of Reference of Working Group:

a)        To revise the ULU Constitution and Regulations with particular, but not exclusive, reference to:

i)          The future direction of ULU;

ii)         The original motion that mandated the review of the executive roles;

iii)        The role of the executive within the democratic structure of ULU;

iv)       The job descriptions of the elected officers;

v)        The relationship between the full-time and part-time executive; and

vi)       The responsibility of the regulation of elections, finances and clubs and societies.

b)        To report and submit recommended changes to the 4th ULU Council of 2002-2003;

c)        To meet at least twice; and

d)        To circulate meeting times to all members of ULU Council.

 

PASSED: 27th January 2003